
What happens to the people behind the headlines after the headlines themselves fade away?
Last weekend I read a background story on the BBC app about a mother whose son had been stabbed to death. The article was published in the wake of a report on the rising number of teenagers in Britain carrying knives and the alarming increase in stabbings among young people. In response to her loss, she created a space where children can gather, play games, and leave behind their phones—and the hostility of the outside world. It was a story that offered a spark of hope amid the shocking realities of teenage life.
But mostly, stories are not followed up. Even this article was written because of a headline, not as a continuation of the story. I often wonder what is happening now, after the headlines have disappeared. What is the current situation in Sudan? Are governments truly following through on promises to combat femicide? Are the inhabitants of the Amazon still losing their battle against “progress”—progress demanded in the name of economic growth? How are the families of those slain coping? And what of the baby penguins I once saw in a documentary—are they still alive, or have the effects of global warming already claimed them?
We live in a world where crises unfold daily. News agencies deliver information, but it is often diluted, packaged into bite-sized morsels for easy consumption. Once digested, the public is fed a new flavor the next day, lest attention waver and audiences drift elsewhere.
Sometimes I wonder if I am the only one who thinks about these things. When I ask friends if they know how certain stories have developed, I am often met with blank stares or vague recollections: “Oh yes, I remember that—it was a long time ago, wasn’t it?”
Is the world simply too much for us to take on? Are we programming ourselves to delete not only information but also curiosity and empathy, because we lack the space to hold on to past events? Have we become addicted to the shock and awe of novelty, riding the adrenaline of fresh headlines, moving as a collective from one high to the next?
Psychology offers explanations. Cognitive Load Theory, developed by John Sweller, describes how our working memory is limited in capacity. When overwhelmed by too much information, we struggle to retain it in long-term memory. In the context of news, the sheer volume of daily crises makes it difficult to hold on to older stories. (https://practicalpie.com/cognitive-load-theory/) Meanwhile, Habituation—a basic form of learning—explains how repeated exposure to a stimulus diminishes our response. Applied to news, this means that as a story is repeated, our emotional and behavioral reactions weaken, reducing urgency and making it easier to forget.(https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-habituation-2795233)
In our age of rapid news cycles, this collective forgetting is almost inevitable. Highly emotional events may linger briefly, but each new crisis lessens the impact of the last.
And yet, forgetting does not absolve us. The inhabitants of the Amazon still face displacement from hydropower projects. More than 150,000 people have died in Sudan, with 12 million forced from their homes—the UN calls it the world’s largest humanitarian crisis. Families of victims continue to live with their grief long after the headlines fade.
Perhaps the challenge is not to remember everything, but to resist the pull of forgetting. If we take a step back and reflect on the news that has passed in recent months, we remind ourselves that while headlines are fleeting, the lives they represent are not. Atrocities remain, and attention is still needed.
We cannot save the entire world, but we can choose not to forget. By practicing sustained attention—by asking what happened next?—we honor the humanity behind the headlines. In doing so, we make space for empathy, and perhaps, for change.
If you enjoy reading my insights and would like to stay updated on my latest posts, please subscribe to my blog for email notifications. Subscription is free!








You must be logged in to post a comment.